This Blog Is Not For Reading

A blog, just like any blog, only more so

  • Subscribe

  • Categories

  • RSS Bob Jonkman’s Microblog

    • New comment by bobjonkman 29 November 2022
      @clacke Our #KWNPSA user group chatted with the #GetTogether developer a few months ago. He said demand for self-hosted G2G instances was minimal, and event interchange even more minimal. So #ActivityPub support on G2G has stalled, and he considers G2G more or less stable and mature.
    • New comment by bobjonkman 28 November 2022
      @lnxw48a1 ...then to Debian with a MATE desktop in 2020. Far less faffing about, finally being productive. Sometimes...
    • Delete 28 November 2022
      Bob Jonkman deleted notice {{,2022-11-28:noticeId=1106500:objectType=comment}}.
    • New comment by bobjonkman 28 November 2022
      @lnxw48a1 I switched to Ubuntu-MATE when they insisted in the Unity desktop, then to Debiab
    • New comment by bobjonkman 28 November 2022
      @lnxw48a1 Ubuntu 22.04 has way too much reliance on snaps. Can't even get a regular install of Firefox, f'rinstance, only a snap.
    • Delete 28 November 2022
      Bob Jonkman deleted notice {{,2022-11-28:noticeId=1106496:objectType=comment}}.
    • Favorite 12 November 2022
      bobjonkman favorited something by lnxw48a1: Oh, look! Evan has his own #Mastodon server now.
    • bobjonkman repeated a notice by lnxw48a1 12 November 2022
      RT @lnxw48a1 Oh, look! Evan has his own #Mastodon server now.
    • New note by bobjonkman 30 September 2022
      That "aura" around bright objects is what I saw when I first got a cataract (clouding of the lens). It wasn't bad at first, and only in one eye, so I let it go until my vision was totally obscured in that eye. Don't do that. Get your eyes checked, and maybe a referral to […]
    • Favorite 30 September 2022
      bobjonkman favorited something by hypolite: Ok, that’s what I thought, thank you for the explanations. When I wear the new glasses, anything beyond a couple of feet is doubled until my eyes adjust which takes more time than with my current glasses, and then it still is almost imperceptibly blurry, although the comparison between the […]

Archive for April, 2009

Invalid HTML considered harmful

Posted by Bob Jonkman on 28th April 2009

Screenshop of HTML Dog Web SiteValid HTML is not just useful for browsers. One of the big benefits of having valid HTML is that search engines can properly index your site. If the HTML is invalid, then the search engines may index you incorrectly, or not at all. Google isn’t the only search engine out there, and you want to drive as much traffic to your site as possible.

There appears to be some contention whether valid HTML makes a difference to search engines or not. Some say it doesn’t; or that it depends on the search engine; others have evidence it matters a lot.

Even if you’re not coding by hand, I urge you to have a look at HTML Dog, a set of tutorials on creating valid HTML. When things don’t work as expected you can turn here for examples in XHTML.

Favicon - HTML Dog

If you’re going to be using an editor for your Web pages, pick an editor that creates proper HTML code. Abandon FrontPage. I suggest using KompoZer, which is based on the same rendering engine as Firefox (Gecko).

Favicon - Kompozer.net

You should also be checking your pages in Opera, which is a browser that is even better for standards-compliance than FireFox. The Chief Technology Officer for Opera is the same guy that wrote the Cascading Style Sheets specification, so it has a good pedigree.

Favicon - Opera.com

If you’re using Firefox then be sure to check your pages with the HTML Validator addon:

Favicon - Skynet.be

Screenshot - HTML ValidatorAnd when you think your site is done, check each page with the full-strength validator:

Favicon - W3C HTML Validator

Favicon - CSS Validation Service

<heavy sigh… />


Posted in considered harmful, valid html | 5 Comments »

Better Tag Cloud